Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Foosball is of the Devil...not Harry Potter
I have several questions and concerns regarding the uproar against the Harry Potter books and movies. I have researched both the author and the series, so I do understand the points of controversy within the Church, although, I am not ready to jump on the evangelical bandwagon that is going to such extremes as attempting to boycott the movie. I have no issue with raising an awareness of the content of any box office film, but this overly defensive and almost frightened response the Church has posed against the release of the movie deeply concerns me. I am afraid that the outspoken, and often ultraconservative, voices of evangelical Christianity are shaping a dumbed down, ignorant bride who is so fearful and weak in faith that she idolatrizes the efforts of the world over the power of Christ. I think it is both ignorant and foolish to reach a verdict on the series before ever actually engaging it. I pray that no unbeliever asks one of us in the middle of our rants if we've even seen it. Jesus never commissioned us to boycott the world. His kingdom isn't of this world. The world will be the world. Jesus knows that the world is a messy and dirty place, and in spite of that he said "Be in it..." I believe that "Be" is active. It goes beyond geography. It's a call to engage secular society, to be familiar with its ways, to know that you are going to get dirty walking in their playground, but that Christ's grace and power in you is bigger and that it's always overcoming. When did Jesus, and when were we ever called to stand across the street and point? Let me reiterate, I have no problem with raising an awareness of the supposed content of this film. But maybe our response shouldn't be to boycott it. Maybe we should spend the obscene amount of money and go see the movie. Maybe we should buy a large popcorn and enjoy the beautiful artistry and cinematography that divinely gifted individuals helped create. And if we should retain concern issues towards the message of this movie after we see it, maybe we would then be more equipped to be salt and light in our conversations with others. May we not run in fear, but may we dive into the dirty playground, trusting the grace and power of Christ to empower us and protect us. And may we learn what it means to be "in" the world, for it is the only hope of the world.
Thursday, January 22, 2009
risky entry
Why I’m against the closing of Gitmo, why I believe in coercive interrogation, and why I don’t use the word “torture.”
I think that the word “torture” is modernly defined far too broadly, emotionally evocative, and often leading people to miss the point. Where historically the subjects of torture may have predominantly been the guilty and the harmful, I think that the Holocaust and other contemporary evils have reshaped its definition to sometimes victimize the innocent. Lest we ever communicate that the acceptable subjects of torture are the innocent, it needs a narrowing redefinition to reemphasize its mission towards the guilty.
So, if you’re asking if I support the “torture” of detained terrorists, no I do not. However, I do support the coercive interrogation of which may consist of similar or the same activities.
That's not to say 'anything goes,' and it should be a means to an end; that is, nation and life-saving information.
As far as I'm concerned, when you become an enemy of humanity, you forfeit your own.
BUT WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?
That is an oversimplified and often misleading question that needs to be placed on the shelf from time to time. Please don’t shut me off yet. I’m not suggesting we do so to overlook any contradiction of Scripture, but simply because there are often a more detailed set of situation-driven questions to be asked.
Romans 13 provides governing authorities a sword with the responsibility of both punishing evil and praising good. Would that not include the punishing of terrorists who exist to annihilate your home and way of life? The concept of “Just War” is both biblical and a necessary perspective in our responses to the evils manifest in various parts of our world. “Just War” is about differentiating wars that are warranted and those that are not. Was World War II warranted? Was our response towards Nazi Germany just and right? Or was our WWJD response to take the pacifist route while excess of 8 million innocent families were executed and burned alive?
I would contend that pacifism is both harmful and in contradiction to our God-given moral sentiments. What if U.S. intelligence agencies took the liberty of engaging in preemptive action which would lead to information to cut that 8 million number in half? Would WWJD say that if they say they don’t want to talk about it to leave them alone? Or would it allow the coercion/interrogation/torture of a few if it meant rewriting history books, saving millions, and giving life to those who have shown no disdain for it.
I know it’s difficult and I know it’s messy, but I would contend that it is both biblically permitted and necessary as we care for those God has placed under our reach.
I think that the word “torture” is modernly defined far too broadly, emotionally evocative, and often leading people to miss the point. Where historically the subjects of torture may have predominantly been the guilty and the harmful, I think that the Holocaust and other contemporary evils have reshaped its definition to sometimes victimize the innocent. Lest we ever communicate that the acceptable subjects of torture are the innocent, it needs a narrowing redefinition to reemphasize its mission towards the guilty.
So, if you’re asking if I support the “torture” of detained terrorists, no I do not. However, I do support the coercive interrogation of which may consist of similar or the same activities.
That's not to say 'anything goes,' and it should be a means to an end; that is, nation and life-saving information.
As far as I'm concerned, when you become an enemy of humanity, you forfeit your own.
BUT WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?
That is an oversimplified and often misleading question that needs to be placed on the shelf from time to time. Please don’t shut me off yet. I’m not suggesting we do so to overlook any contradiction of Scripture, but simply because there are often a more detailed set of situation-driven questions to be asked.
Romans 13 provides governing authorities a sword with the responsibility of both punishing evil and praising good. Would that not include the punishing of terrorists who exist to annihilate your home and way of life? The concept of “Just War” is both biblical and a necessary perspective in our responses to the evils manifest in various parts of our world. “Just War” is about differentiating wars that are warranted and those that are not. Was World War II warranted? Was our response towards Nazi Germany just and right? Or was our WWJD response to take the pacifist route while excess of 8 million innocent families were executed and burned alive?
I would contend that pacifism is both harmful and in contradiction to our God-given moral sentiments. What if U.S. intelligence agencies took the liberty of engaging in preemptive action which would lead to information to cut that 8 million number in half? Would WWJD say that if they say they don’t want to talk about it to leave them alone? Or would it allow the coercion/interrogation/torture of a few if it meant rewriting history books, saving millions, and giving life to those who have shown no disdain for it.
I know it’s difficult and I know it’s messy, but I would contend that it is both biblically permitted and necessary as we care for those God has placed under our reach.
Sunday, January 11, 2009
I Will Raise My Glass
Malachi 3:16; "Then those who feared the LORD spoke to one another, and the LORD listened and heard them; so a book of remembrance was written before Him for those who fear the LORD and who meditate on His name."
I think it's interesting who the book was written for. It was written for those who fear God, not for God. So, I wouldn't interpret it as being God's record keeping either for future admonition or future rebuking. Rather, as his staff comforting us.
Historically, when shepherds would go out for extended periods of time to tend the sheep and take care of other needs, they would write their favorite passages of Scripture upon their staffs as a reminder of God's goodness and nearness.
I think this book of remembrance served the same purpose for those Malachi writes of. Also, that although maybe in different form, God has preserved this book in the hearts of his children today. A work that is never finished. Written upon by saints for thousands of years, continued to be penned by each one of us as we observe the providence and grace of God in the most beautiful and the most dark of times.
I can't help but get the imagery of a work that's finally bound at the end of time. That when we approach that table with family, friends, and saints long past, that there might be a copy waiting at each seat. That there we might raise our glass of wine and each, one by one, take our turns remembering and declaring, "This is what He did..."
I think it's interesting who the book was written for. It was written for those who fear God, not for God. So, I wouldn't interpret it as being God's record keeping either for future admonition or future rebuking. Rather, as his staff comforting us.
Historically, when shepherds would go out for extended periods of time to tend the sheep and take care of other needs, they would write their favorite passages of Scripture upon their staffs as a reminder of God's goodness and nearness.
I think this book of remembrance served the same purpose for those Malachi writes of. Also, that although maybe in different form, God has preserved this book in the hearts of his children today. A work that is never finished. Written upon by saints for thousands of years, continued to be penned by each one of us as we observe the providence and grace of God in the most beautiful and the most dark of times.
I can't help but get the imagery of a work that's finally bound at the end of time. That when we approach that table with family, friends, and saints long past, that there might be a copy waiting at each seat. That there we might raise our glass of wine and each, one by one, take our turns remembering and declaring, "This is what He did..."
Sunday, November 23, 2008
I really, really like this quote:
"The most powerful drive in the ascent of man is his pleasure in his own skill. He loves to do waht he does well, and having done it well, he loves to do it better. You see it in his science. You see it in the magnificence with which he carves and builds, the loving care, the gaiety, the effrontery. The monuments are supposed to commemorate kings and religions, heroes, dogmas, but in the end the man they commemorate is the builder."
-Jacob Bronowski
By the way, apparently Coldplay's song, "Lost!" has a version where Jay-Z raps on it. I'm not going to lie, it's pretty awesome.
"The most powerful drive in the ascent of man is his pleasure in his own skill. He loves to do waht he does well, and having done it well, he loves to do it better. You see it in his science. You see it in the magnificence with which he carves and builds, the loving care, the gaiety, the effrontery. The monuments are supposed to commemorate kings and religions, heroes, dogmas, but in the end the man they commemorate is the builder."
-Jacob Bronowski
By the way, apparently Coldplay's song, "Lost!" has a version where Jay-Z raps on it. I'm not going to lie, it's pretty awesome.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
a love letter skillfully crafted
It really wasn't that long ago that Christ chose to reveal himself to me. December 31, 2001 to be exact. I guess in some circles that would entail a "birthday" coming up. I typically veer away from the title, mostly because a birthday absent of cake or gifts has a depressing ring to it. December 31st awakened me and quickly thrust me into a love for God and a love for anything bearing the name of God. I inundated myself in Christian subculture; the bracelets, the horrible movies, the mediocre music, (thankfully not the t-shirts). I may not have been Ned Flanders, but I was a distant cousin. Wrapped up in the youthful zeal of my faith was a lot of ignorance. A lot.
I used to think hymns were outdated expressions of worship that probably displeased God. What God enjoyed was the new worship music, the ones with simpler, more heart-felt lyrics. The ones with better (and louder) melodies, not that stuff with an old muffled organ and wordy words I had never even heard of. Spontenaity was the purest and most powerful expressions of the heart.
I couldn't be further from that confession than I am now.
Imagine a man's response when he first hears that his wife and children have been taken captive by the enemy and slaughtered. He throws himself to the ground, cries out in tormet, rips his clothes, and rubs his head in ashes, until his energy ebbs into a pitiable, "No, no, no." Here is utter spontaneity, utterly real emotion, no studied design, no conscious constraints.
But picture this man a week later, when the services are over and the friends have departed, and he is alone with the weight of his loss. The excruciating pain of the first blast is gone, and now there is the throb and ache of an amputated soul. What does he do to express this deep and settling grief? Between the periodic heaving sobs he reaches for a form and begins to make his lamentation. Studied, crafted, pondered, full of power. When the time comes, he will read or recite this lamentation. But no one will say of this formed grief: "It is canned." On the contrary, it will strike deeper than the sobs. It will show more of what he has brought up from the depths. (John Piper)
Here's an old hymn that has got my heart lately:
Be Thou My Vision
Be Thou my Vision, O Lord of my heart;
Naught be all else to me, save that Thou art.
Thou my best Thought, by day or by night,
Waking or sleeping, Thy presence my light.
Be Thou my Wisdom, and Thou my true Word;
I ever with Thee and Thou with me, Lord;
Thou my great Father, I Thy true son;
Thou in me dwelling, and I with Thee one.
Be Thou my battle Shield, Sword for the fight;
Be Thou my Dignity, Thou my Delight;
Thou my soul’s Shelter, Thou my high Tower:
Raise Thou me heavenward, O Power of my power.
Riches I heed not, nor man’s empty praise,
Thou mine Inheritance, now and always:
Thou and Thou only, first in my heart,
High King of Heaven, my Treasure Thou art.
High King of Heaven, my victory won,
May I reach Heaven’s joys, O bright Heaven’s Sun!
Heart of my own heart, whatever befall,
Still be my Vision, O Ruler of all.
There is legitimacy in spontenaiety and there is beauty in craft. Don't remain with the ignorance of your youth. Dig deep. Find that which lies behind every desire and every confession of your soul. It may take some work. It may arouse some hidden pain. The beauty you discover will be far exceeding.
May you live the deepest life possible.
I used to think hymns were outdated expressions of worship that probably displeased God. What God enjoyed was the new worship music, the ones with simpler, more heart-felt lyrics. The ones with better (and louder) melodies, not that stuff with an old muffled organ and wordy words I had never even heard of. Spontenaity was the purest and most powerful expressions of the heart.
I couldn't be further from that confession than I am now.
Imagine a man's response when he first hears that his wife and children have been taken captive by the enemy and slaughtered. He throws himself to the ground, cries out in tormet, rips his clothes, and rubs his head in ashes, until his energy ebbs into a pitiable, "No, no, no." Here is utter spontaneity, utterly real emotion, no studied design, no conscious constraints.
But picture this man a week later, when the services are over and the friends have departed, and he is alone with the weight of his loss. The excruciating pain of the first blast is gone, and now there is the throb and ache of an amputated soul. What does he do to express this deep and settling grief? Between the periodic heaving sobs he reaches for a form and begins to make his lamentation. Studied, crafted, pondered, full of power. When the time comes, he will read or recite this lamentation. But no one will say of this formed grief: "It is canned." On the contrary, it will strike deeper than the sobs. It will show more of what he has brought up from the depths. (John Piper)
Here's an old hymn that has got my heart lately:
Be Thou My Vision
Be Thou my Vision, O Lord of my heart;
Naught be all else to me, save that Thou art.
Thou my best Thought, by day or by night,
Waking or sleeping, Thy presence my light.
Be Thou my Wisdom, and Thou my true Word;
I ever with Thee and Thou with me, Lord;
Thou my great Father, I Thy true son;
Thou in me dwelling, and I with Thee one.
Be Thou my battle Shield, Sword for the fight;
Be Thou my Dignity, Thou my Delight;
Thou my soul’s Shelter, Thou my high Tower:
Raise Thou me heavenward, O Power of my power.
Riches I heed not, nor man’s empty praise,
Thou mine Inheritance, now and always:
Thou and Thou only, first in my heart,
High King of Heaven, my Treasure Thou art.
High King of Heaven, my victory won,
May I reach Heaven’s joys, O bright Heaven’s Sun!
Heart of my own heart, whatever befall,
Still be my Vision, O Ruler of all.
There is legitimacy in spontenaiety and there is beauty in craft. Don't remain with the ignorance of your youth. Dig deep. Find that which lies behind every desire and every confession of your soul. It may take some work. It may arouse some hidden pain. The beauty you discover will be far exceeding.
May you live the deepest life possible.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
neither here nor there then where
I've got to be honest here for a moment. There are a few things I need to get out there, but I hope it doesn't make you think any less of me. I guess you could say I am one of those guys who's vulnerability is reserved for a few. I like to have it all together, have all the answers, and of course, tell you them all as well. I can't put my finger on it, but tonight, something tells me you deserve more than my shallow depth.
I feel somewhat stuck in the middle. Neither here nor there. I've graduated Southeastern, I've started a Masters degree that I'll finish in April, and then where...what...who...? Things seem to be at a standstill now, and yet moving so fast at the same time. I probably sound crazy, I'm trying really hard to explain it. I feel like I should be doing so much to prepare for my future, for this grand mystery that exists somewhere five months from now.
I'm not having much luck communicating tonight. I guess this is all that needs to be said for now. I leave you with this,
"Do not lose hold of your dreams or aspirations. For if you do, you may still exist but you have ceased to live." -Henry David Throeau
I feel somewhat stuck in the middle. Neither here nor there. I've graduated Southeastern, I've started a Masters degree that I'll finish in April, and then where...what...who...? Things seem to be at a standstill now, and yet moving so fast at the same time. I probably sound crazy, I'm trying really hard to explain it. I feel like I should be doing so much to prepare for my future, for this grand mystery that exists somewhere five months from now.
I'm not having much luck communicating tonight. I guess this is all that needs to be said for now. I leave you with this,
"Do not lose hold of your dreams or aspirations. For if you do, you may still exist but you have ceased to live." -Henry David Throeau
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
shortsighted
Here's a quote I read tonight. I initially had some thoughts about it...
The inherent vice of capitalism is the uneven division of blessings, while the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal division of misery.
- Sir Winston Churchill
The root of "uneven division of blessings" is not the vice of capitalism, but the outworkings of human nature as clearly revealed in a free market environment. Some would suggest that opportunity is unequally distributed in America. If that is to be said of our citizens, how do we reconcile the fact that every day, people cross our borders with the clothes on their backs and the pennies in their pockets, only to rise as perpetual testaments to the American dream. To be honest, I have a hard time believing that there is true poverty in america when a vast majority of our lowest income bracket carries cell phones and drives their own cars. Could it be not so much a lack of opportunity as it is a paralyzing sense of entitlement, or sheer laziness, or a harmful misappropriation of priorities, if not all of the above? I hope that I don't sound cold hearted. I do bear compassion towards the socially unfortunate, but most of my compassion is not towards their financial situation. It's towards their inability to stand freely on their own two feet. Government granting more "opportunity" won't make the difference, and likewise, neither has money the capacity heal judgments, cultivate discipline, or realign priority. The answer is not a change in government or in market structure, it's an empowered church who is healing and restoring minds and hearts that can stand on their own two feet again, if not for the first time ever. Minds and hearts that are free to grab onto and hold onto the opportunities that have been before them all along.
The inherent vice of capitalism is the uneven division of blessings, while the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal division of misery.
- Sir Winston Churchill
The root of "uneven division of blessings" is not the vice of capitalism, but the outworkings of human nature as clearly revealed in a free market environment. Some would suggest that opportunity is unequally distributed in America. If that is to be said of our citizens, how do we reconcile the fact that every day, people cross our borders with the clothes on their backs and the pennies in their pockets, only to rise as perpetual testaments to the American dream. To be honest, I have a hard time believing that there is true poverty in america when a vast majority of our lowest income bracket carries cell phones and drives their own cars. Could it be not so much a lack of opportunity as it is a paralyzing sense of entitlement, or sheer laziness, or a harmful misappropriation of priorities, if not all of the above? I hope that I don't sound cold hearted. I do bear compassion towards the socially unfortunate, but most of my compassion is not towards their financial situation. It's towards their inability to stand freely on their own two feet. Government granting more "opportunity" won't make the difference, and likewise, neither has money the capacity heal judgments, cultivate discipline, or realign priority. The answer is not a change in government or in market structure, it's an empowered church who is healing and restoring minds and hearts that can stand on their own two feet again, if not for the first time ever. Minds and hearts that are free to grab onto and hold onto the opportunities that have been before them all along.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
